Personalized Healtcare or Personalized Medicine or PM is a medical model that proposes the customization of healthcare – with medical decisions, practices, and/or products being tailored to the individual patient. In this model, diagnostic testing is often employed for selecting appropriate and optimal therapies based on the context of a patient’s genetic content and/or other molecular analysis. The use of genetic information has played a major role in certain aspects of personalized medicine (e.g. pharmacogenomics), and the term was first coined in the context of genetics, though it has since broadened to encompass all sorts of personalization measures.
- 1 Background
- 2 Applications
- 3 Challenges
- 4 References
Every person has a unique variation of the human genome. Although most of the variation between individuals has no effect on health, an individual’s health stems from genetic variation with behaviors and influences from the environment.
One way that biological variation among people makes itself clear, is responsiveness to drugs: ADHD medicine only works for one of ten preschoolers, cancer drugs are effective for 25% of patients, and depression drugs work with 6 of 10 patients.
Modern advances in personalized medicine rely on technology that confirms a patient’s fundamental biology, DNA, RNA, or protein, which ultimately leads to confirming disease. For example, personalized medicine techniques such as genome sequencing can reveal mutations in DNA that influence diseases ranging from cystic fibrosis to cancer. Another method, called RNA-seq, can show which RNA’s are involved with specific diseases. Unlike DNA, levels of RNA change in response to the environment. Therefore, sequencing RNA can reveal a broader understanding of a person’s state of health. Methods of RNA-seq are very similar to genome sequencing.
Obtaining your genome sequence is not difficult and is vital to any personalization of medicine. This can be done by your doctor or by genome testing kits from private companies. Body fluid or tissue, such as blood or saliva, is taken and sent to a lab. Many companies have customers spit into a vial and mail it to their lab, where DNA can be extracted and sequenced. The company uses genome sequencing technology to read the genome nucleotide by nucleotide, and high-speed computers assemble the genome into an easy-to-visualize display. Any variation of the genome will be highlighted and doctors or researchers can see if a specific mutation is related to a disease. While the cost of genome sequencing is still expensive, the costs are falling at a fast rate and may soon be affordable to the average person.
In order for doctors to know if a mutation is connected to a certain disease, researchers often do a study called a “Genome-wide association study” (GWAS). A GWAS study will look at one disease, and then sequence the genome of many patients with that particular disease to look for shared mutations in the genome. Mutations that are determined to be related to a disease by a GWAS study can then be used to diagnose that disease in future patients, by looking at their genome sequence to find that same mutation. The first GWAS, conducted in 2005, studied patients with age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). It found two different mutations, each containing only a variation in only one nucleotide (called Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, or SNPs), which were associated with ARMD. GWAS studies like this have been very successful in identifying common genetic variations associated with diseases. As of early 2014, over 1,300 GWAS studies have been completed.
Interestingly, saliva samples used for sequencing also contain the DNA of all bacteria in the mouth. This is not viewed as contamination, and can actually be used to analyze the bacterial colonies that could possibly lead to infections like gingivitis. There is an entire field dedicated to sequencing and identifying bacteria that reside in humans, called metagenomics (and also microbiomics).
Disease Risk Assessment
Multiple genes collectively influence the likelihood of developing many common and complex diseases. Personalized medicine can also be used to predict a person’s risk for a particular disease, based on one or even several genes. This approach uses the same sequencing technology to focus on the evaluation of disease risk, allowing the physician to initiate preventative treatment before the disease presents itself in their patient. For example, if it is found that a DNA mutation increases a person’s risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes, this individual can begin lifestyle changes that will lessen their chances of developing Type 2 Diabetes later in life.
There are endless advantages that personalized medicine offers, and as it develops, will change the way that medicine is practiced. A complaint of today’s current approaches to health care is that there are no fixed standards to define how medicine is practiced. Advances in personalized medicine will create a more unified treatment approach specific to the individual and their genome. Personalized medicine offers the hope of better diagnoses with earlier intervention, and more efficient drug development and therapies.
Diagnosis and Intervention
Having the ability to look at a patient on an individual basis will allow for a more accurate diagnosis and specific treatment plan. Genotyping is the process of obtaining an individual’s DNA sequence by using biological assays. By having a detailed account of an individual’s DNA sequence, their genome can then be compared to a reference genome, like that of the Human Genome Project, to assess the existing genetic variations that can account for possible diseases. A number of private companies, such as 23andMe, Navigenics, and Illumina, have created Direct-to-Consumer genome sequencing accessible to the public. Having this information from individuals can then be applied to effectively treat them. An individual’s genetic make-up also plays a large role in how well they respond to a certain treatment, and therefore, knowing their genetic content can change the type of treatment they receive.
An aspect of this is pharmacogenomics, which uses an individual’s genome to provide a more informed and tailored drug prescription. Often, drugs are prescribed with the idea that it will work relatively the same for everyone, but in the application of drugs, there are a number of factors that must be considered. The detailed account of genetic information from the individual will help prevent adverse events, allow for appropriate dosages, and create maximum efficacy with drug prescriptions.
In addition to specific treatment, personalized medicine can greatly aid the advancements of preventive care. For instance, many women are already being genotyped for certain mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene if they are predisposed because of a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. As more causes of diseases are mapped out according to mutations that exist within a genome, the easier they can be identified in an individual. Measures can then be taken to prevent a disease from developing. Even if mutations were found within a genome, having the details of their DNA can reduce the impact or delay the onset of certain diseases. Having the genetic content of an individual will allow better guided decisions in determining the source of the disease and thus treating it or preventing its progression. This will be extremely useful for diseases like Alzheimer’s or cancers that are thought to be linked to certain mutations in our DNA.
A tool that is being used now to test efficacy and safety of a drug specific to a targeted patient group/sub-group is companion diagnostics. This technology is an assay that is developed during or after a drug is made available on the market and is helpful in enhancing the therapeutic treatment available based on the individual. These companion diagnostics have incorporated the pharmacogenomic information related to the drug into their prescription label in an effort to assist in making the most optimal treatment decision possible for the patient.
Drug Development and Usage
Having an individual’s genomic information can be significant in the process of developing drugs as they await approval from the FDA for public use. Having a detailed account of an individual’s genetic make-up can be a major asset in deciding if a patient can be chosen for inclusion or exclusion in the final stages of a clinical trial. Being able to identify patients who will benefit most from a clinical trial will increase the safety of patients from adverse outcomes caused by the product in testing, and will allow smaller and faster trials that lead to lower overall costs. In addition, drugs that are deemed ineffective for the larger population can gain approval by the FDA by using personal genomes to qualify the effectiveness and need for that specific drug or therapy even though it may only be needed by a small percentage of the population.,
Today in medicine, it is common that physicians often use a trial and error strategy until they find the treatment therapy that is most effective for their patient. With personalized medicine, these treatments can be more specifically tailored to an individual and give insight into how their body will respond to the drug and if that drug will work based on their genome. The personal genotype can allow physicians to have more detailed information that will guide them in their decision in treatment prescriptions, which will be more cost-effective and accurate. As quoted from the articlePharmacogenomics: The Promise of Personalized Medicine, “therapy with the right drug at the right dose in the right patient” is a great description of how personalized medicine will affect the future of treatment. For instance, Tamoxifen used to be a drug commonly prescribed to women with ER+ breast cancer, but 65% of women initially taking it developed resistance. After some research, it was discovered that women with certain mutation in their CYP2D6 gene, a gene that encodes the metabolizing enzyme, were not able to efficiently break down Tamoxifen, making it an ineffective treatment for their cancer. Since then, women are now genotyped for those specific mutations, so that immediately these women can have the most effective treatment therapy.
Pharmacy compounding is another application of personalized medicine. Though not necessarily utilizing genetic information, the customized production of a drug product whose various properties (e.g. dose level, ingredient selection, route of administration, etc.) are selected and crafted for an individual patient is accepted as an area of personalized medicine – in contrast to mass producedunit doses or fixed-dose combinations.
Over recent decades cancer research has discovered a great deal about the genetic variety of types of cancer that appear the same in traditional pathology. There has also been increasing awareness of tumour heterogeneity, or genetic diversity within a single tumour. Among other prospects, these discoveries raise the possibility of finding that drugs that have not given good results applied to a general population of cases may yet be successful for a proportion of cases with particular genetic profiles.
Cancer Genomics, or “Oncogenomics,” is the application of genomics and personalized medicine to cancer research and treatment. High-throughput sequencing methods are used to characterize genes associated with cancer to better understand disease pathology and improve drug development. Oncogenomics is one of the most promising branches of genomics, particularly because of its implications in drug therapy. Examples of this include:
- Trastuzumab (trade names Herclon, Herceptin) is a monoclonal antibody drug that interferes with the HER2/neu receptor. Its main use is to treat certain breast cancers. This drug is only used if a patient’s cancer is tested for overexpression of the HER2/neu receptor. Two tissue-typing tests are used to screen patients for possible benefit from Herceptin treatment. The tissue tests areimmunohistochemistry(IHC) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization(FISH) Only Her2+ patients will be treated with Herceptin therapy (trastuzumab)
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib (marketed as Gleevec) have been developed to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), in which the BCR-ABL fusion gene (the product of a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 9 and chromosome 22) is present in >95% of cases and produces hyperactivated abl-driven protein signaling. These medications specifically inhibit the Ableson tyrosine kinase (ABL) protein and are thus a prime example of “rational drug design” based on knowledge of disease pathophysiology.
As personalized medicine is practiced more widely, a number of challenges arise. The current approaches to intellectual property rights, reimbursement policies, patient privacy and confidentiality as well as regulatory oversight will have to be redefined and restructured to accommodate the changes personalized medicine will bring to healthcare. Furthermore, the analysis of acquired diagnostic data is a recent challenge of personalized medicine and its adoption. For example, genetic data obtained from next-generation sequencing requires compute-intensive data processing prior to its analysis. In future, adequate tools are required to accelerate the adoption of personalized medicine to further fields of medicine, which requires the interdisciplinary cooperation of experts from specific fields of research, such as medicine, clinical oncology, biology, and software engineering.
The FDA has already started to take initiatives to integrate personalized medicine into their regulatory policies. They developed a report in October 2013 entitled, “Paving the Way for Personalized Medicine: FDA’s role in a New Era of Medical Product Development,” in which they outlined steps they would have to take to integrate genetic and biomarker information for clinical use and drug development. They determined that they would have to develop specific regulatory science standards, research methods, reference material and other tools in order to incorporate personalized medicine into their current regulatory practices. For example, they are working on a “genomic reference library” for regulatory agencies to compare and test the validity of different sequencing platforms in an effort to uphold reliability.
Intellectual Property Rights
As with any innovation in medicine, investment and interest in personalized medicine is influenced by intellectual property rights. There has been a lot of controversy regarding patent protection for diagnostic tools, genes, and biomarkers. In June 2013, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that natural occurring genes cannot be patented, while “synthetic DNA” that is edited or artificially- created can still be patented. The Patent Office is currently reviewing a number of issues related to patent laws for personalized medicine, such as whether “confirmatory” secondary genetic tests post initial diagnosis, can have full immunity from patent laws. Those who oppose patents argue that patents on DNA sequences are an impediment to ongoing research while proponents agree that patents are necessary to protect the financial investments required for research and the development and advancement of services offered.
Reimbursement policies will have to be redefined to fit the changes that personalized medicine will bring to the healthcare system. Some of the factors that should be considered are the level of efficacy of various genetic tests in the general population, cost-effectiveness relative to benefits, how to deal with payment systems for extremely rare conditions, and how to redefine the insurance concept of “shared risk” to incorporate the effect of the newer concept of “individual risk factors.”
Patient Privacy and Confidentiality
Perhaps the most critical issue with the commercialization of personalized medicine is the protection of patients. One of the largest issues is the fear and potential consequences for patients who are predisposed after genetic testing or found to be non-responsive towards certain treatments. This includes the psychological effects on patients due to genetic testing results. The right of family members who do not directly consent is another issue, considering that genetic predispositions and risks are inheritable. The implications for certain ethnic groups and presence of a common allele would also have to be considered. In 2008, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed in an effort to minimize the fear of patients participating in genetic research by ensuring that their genetic information will not be misused by employers or insurers.
- “Personalized Medicine 101”. Personalized Medicine Coalition. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
- Dudley, J; Karczewski, K. (2014). Exploring Personal Genomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- “Personalized Medicine 101: The Science”. Personalized Medicine Coalition. Retrieved26 April 2014.
- “When Healthcare and Computer Science Collide”. University of Illinois at Chicago. University of Illinois at Chicago Health Information Management Department. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
- Haines, J.L. (Apr 15, 2005). “Complement Factor H Variant Increases the Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration”. Science 308 (5720): 419–21. doi:10.1126/science.1110359.PMID 15761120.
- “Personalized Medicine 101: The Promise”. Personalized Medicine Coalition. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
- “Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools: Human Genome Project”. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “Genetics Home Reference: What is pharmacogenomics?”. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “Fact Sheet: BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer and Genetic Testing”. National Cancer Institute (NCI). Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “BIOMARKER TOOLKIT: Companion Diagnostics”. Amgen. Retrieved May 2, 2014.
- “Paving the Way for Personalized Medicine: FDA’s Role in a New Era of Medical Product Development.”. Federal Drug Administration (FDA). Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “The Path to Personalized Medicine”. New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). July 22, 2010.doi:10.1056/nejmp1006304. Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “Pharmacogenomics. The Promise of Personalized Medicine”. AAPS PharmSci 2000. January 28, 2000. Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- “Breast Cancer in the Personal Genomics Era.”. Current Genomics: Bentham Science. Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- Carney, Walter (2006). “HER2/neu Status is an Important Biomarker in Guiding Personalized HER2/neu Therapy”. Connection 9: 25–27.
- Telli, M. L.; Hunt, S. A.; Carlson, R. W.; Guardino, A. E. (2007). “Trastuzumab-Related Cardiotoxicity: Calling Into Question the Concept of Reversibility”. Journal of Clinical Oncology 25(23): 3525–3533. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0106. ISSN 0732-183X. PMID 17687157.
- Saglio G, Morotti A, Mattioli G, et al. (December 2004). “Rational approaches to the design of therapeutics targeting molecular markers: the case of chronic myelogenous leukemia”. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1028 (1): 423–31. Bibcode:2004NYASA1028..423S. doi:10.1196/annals.1322.050.PMID 15650267.
- “Personalized Medicine 101: The Challenges.”. Personalized Medicine Coalition. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
- Huser, V; Sincan, M; Cimino, J. J. (2014). “Developing genomic knowledge bases and databases to support clinical management: Current perspectives”. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine 7: 275–83. doi:10.2147/PGPM.S49904. PMC 4175027. PMID 25276091.
- “Analyze Genomes: Motivation”. Schapranow, Matthieu-P. Retrieved July 20, 2014.
- “Paving the Way for Personalized Medicine: FDA’s Role in a New Era of Medical Product Development”. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
- “Intellectual Property Issues Impacting the Future of Personalized Medicine.”. American Intellectual Property Law Association. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
The term “personalized medicine” is often described as providing “the right patient with the right drug at the right dose at the right time.” More broadly, “personalized medicine” may be thought of as the tailoring of medical treatment to the individual characteristics, needs, and preferences of a patient during all stages of care, including prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.
Consistent with FDA’s core mission, the agency is working in collaboration with researchers, manufacturers of drugs, medical devices and biologics, health care professionals and others to better understand and adapt to the promise of personalized medicine. FDA’s ongoing efforts to make personalized medicine possible touch on various facets of product development and use including:
FDA is helping to speed the development of promising new therapeutics by developing regulatory science standards, reference libraries, research methods, and tools that are needed for integrating genetic and other biomarker information into drug and device development and clinical decision-making. Below are some examples of how FDA is doing this.
More than a decade ago, FDA began putting in place the regulatory processes, policies and infrastructure that can support the challenges of regulating personalized medicine products. Certain offices within the agency’s National Center for Toxicological Research, the Center for Drugs, the Center for Biologics and the Center for Devices were restructured to better adapt to the scientific and regulatory challenges posed by personalized research. In addition, a new position of Deputy Commissioner for Medical Products and Tobacco and accompanying office were established to provide high-level coordination and leadership for these efforts.
FDA has also issued guidance documents and regulations that seek to clarify regulatory requirements, coordinate premarket reviews, delineate the activities and responsibilities of the different centers and provide consistency and timeliness in the oversight of personalized medicine products. They
provide guidance on a broad range of topics, such as incorporating genetic and other biomarker information in drug development programs, designing clinical trials to incorporate biomarker data, coordinating cross-labeling activities, evaluating pharmacogenomics data, and demonstrating companion diagnostic test performance.
Given the nature of personalized medicine, the FDA places high priority on helping to ensure that the agency, drug manufacturers, physicians and patients have adequate information about the product and its use. Product labeling and tracking of use in the marketplace are critical to the proper application of personalized medication tools.
The FDA requires product labeling to be balanced, scientifically accurate and not misleading, and that clear instructions be communicated to healthcare practitioners for drug prescribing and/or administration. Personalized medicines that may only be safe and effective in particular sub-populations, or must be administered in different doses in different sub-populations, must be labeled accordingly. To date, the labeling of more than 100 approved drugscontain information on genomic biomarkers (including gene variants, functional deficiencies, expression changes, chromosomal abnormalities, and others).
While personalized medicine will likely allow for more focused clinical trials by increasing the proportion of responders in the trial or increasing the average effect size, or both, one implication of dramatically smaller pre-market exposure is a general increase in the importance of and emphasis on post-market monitoring, because relatively rare adverse events, in particular, are unlikely to show up when a drug is being tested in a small population, may arise when a broader population is treated. Post-market surveillance, then, is critical to the success of personalized medicine.
For more information: